You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Higher percentage of CD133+ cells is associated with poor prognosis in colon carcinoma patients with stage IIIB
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5876-7-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun-Yan Li, Bao-Xiu Li, Yi Liang, Rui-Qing Peng, Ya Ding, Da-Zhi Xu, Xin Zhang, Zhi-Zhong Pan, De-Sen Wan, Yi-Xin Zeng, Xiao-Feng Zhu, Xiao-Shi Zhang |
| Abstract |
Cancer stem cell model suggested that tumor progression is driven by the overpopulation of cancer stem cells and eradicating or inhibiting the symmetric division of cancer stem cells would become the most important therapeutic strategy. However, clinical evidence for this hypothesis is still scarce. To evaluate the overpopulation hypothesis of cancer stem cells the association of percentage of CD133+ tumor cells with clinicopathological parameters in colon cancer was investigated since CD133 is a putative cancer stem cell marker shared by multiple solid tumors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 35% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,235
of 3,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,066
of 109,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.