You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mixed-method analysis of program leader perspectives on the sustainment of multiple child evidence-based practices in a system-driven implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0737-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriana Rodriguez, Anna S. Lau, Blanche Wright, Jennifer Regan, Lauren Brookman-Frazee |
| Abstract |
Understanding program leader perspectives on the sustainment of evidence-based practice (EBP) in community mental health settings is essential to improving implementation. To date, however, much of the literature has focused on direct service provider perspectives on EBP implementation. The aim of this mixed-method study was to identify factors associated with the sustainment of multiple EBPs within a system-driven implementation effort in children's mental health services. Data were gathered from 186 leaders at 59 agencies within the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health who were contracted to deliver one of six EBPs within the Prevention and Early Intervention initiative. Multi-level analyses of quantitative survey data (N = 186) revealed a greater probability of leader-reported EBP sustainment in large agencies and when leaders held more positive perceptions toward the EBP. Themes from semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with a subset of survey participants (n = 47) expanded quantitative findings by providing detail on facilitating conditions in larger agencies and aspects of EBP fit that were perceived to lead to greater sustainment, including perceived fit with client needs, implementation requirements, aspects of the organizational workforce, availability of trainings, and overall therapist attitudes about EBPs. Findings inform EBP implementation efforts regarding decisions around organizational-level supports and promotion of EBP fit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,847,636
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#641
of 1,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,931
of 333,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.