You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at high temporal resolution: radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-12-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuo Zhang, Martin Uecker, Dirk Voit, Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt, Jens Frahm |
| Abstract |
Functional assessments of the heart by dynamic cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) commonly rely on (i) electrocardiographic (ECG) gating yielding pseudo real-time cine representations, (ii) balanced gradient-echo sequences referred to as steady-state free precession (SSFP), and (iii) breath holding or respiratory gating. Problems may therefore be due to the need for a robust ECG signal, the occurrence of arrhythmia and beat to beat variations, technical instabilities (e.g., SSFP "banding" artefacts), and limited patient compliance and comfort. Here we describe a new approach providing true real-time CMR with image acquisition times as short as 20 to 30 ms or rates of 30 to 50 frames per second. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 94 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 32 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,272,326
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#388
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,650
of 105,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them