↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of a cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral patient decision aid in routine clinical practice: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of a cystic fibrosis lung transplant referral patient decision aid in routine clinical practice: an observational study
Published in
Implementation Science, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0206-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dawn Stacey, Katherine L Vandemheen, Rosamund Hennessey, Tracy Gooyers, Ena Gaudet, Ranjeeta Mallick, Josette Salgado, Andreas Freitag, Yves Berthiaume, Neil Brown, Shawn D Aaron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Philosophy 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 25 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#11,885,051
of 20,475,924 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,375
of 1,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,020
of 317,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,475,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.