↓ Skip to main content

Computational identification of DrosophilamicroRNA genes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
610 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
435 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational identification of DrosophilamicroRNA genes
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2003
DOI 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-r42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric C Lai, Pavel Tomancak, Robert W Williams, Gerald M Rubin

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a large family of 21-22 nucleotide non-coding RNAs with presumed post-transcriptional regulatory activity. Most miRNAs were identified by direct cloning of small RNAs, an approach that favors detection of abundant miRNAs. Three observations suggested that miRNA genes might be identified using a computational approach. First, miRNAs generally derive from precursor transcripts of 70-100 nucleotides with extended stem-loop structure. Second, miRNAs are usually highly conserved between the genomes of related species. Third, miRNAs display a characteristic pattern of evolutionary divergence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 5 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Turkey 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 401 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 26%
Researcher 93 21%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Student > Master 42 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 36 8%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 44 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 230 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 18%
Computer Science 26 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 4%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 55 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,240,751
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,860
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,113
of 52,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.