↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and diagnostic aspects of feline cutaneous leishmaniosis in Venezuela

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and diagnostic aspects of feline cutaneous leishmaniosis in Venezuela
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13071-018-2747-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aruanai Kalú Rivas, Magdalena Alcover, Pamela Martínez-Orellana, Sara Montserrat-Sangrà, Yaarit Nachum-Biala, Mar Bardagí, Roser Fisa, Cristina Riera, Gad Baneth, Laia Solano-Gallego

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,348,775
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,338
of 5,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,003
of 332,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#84
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.