↓ Skip to main content

Lack of genomic evidence of AI-2 receptors suggests a non-quorum sensing role for luxS in most bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lack of genomic evidence of AI-2 receptors suggests a non-quorum sensing role for luxS in most bacteria
Published in
BMC Microbiology, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-8-154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Rezzonico, Brion Duffy

Abstract

Great excitement accompanied discoveries over the last decade in several Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria of the LuxS protein, which catalyzes production of the AI-2 autoinducer molecule for a second quorum sensing system (QS-2). Since the luxS gene was found to be widespread among the most diverse bacterial taxa, it was hypothesized that AI-2 may constitute the basis of a universal microbial language, a kind of bacterial Esperanto. Many of the studies published in this field have drawn a direct correlation between the occurrence of the luxS gene in a given organism and the presence and functionality of a QS-2 therein. However, rarely hathe existence of potential AI-2 receptors been examined. This is important, since it is now well recognized that LuxS also holds a central role as a metabolic enzyme in the activated methyl cycle which is responsible for the generation of S-adenosyl-L-methionine, the major methyl donor in the cell.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 168 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Chemistry 7 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 35 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#958
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,204
of 98,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.