↓ Skip to main content

Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
237 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
423 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0523-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

James R Whittle, Michael T Lewis, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Jane E Visvader

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of patients with early and metastatic breast cancer, mortality remains high due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to therapy. Increased understanding of the genomic landscape through massively parallel sequencing has revealed somatic mutations common to specific subtypes of breast cancer, provided new prognostic and predictive markers, and highlighted potential therapeutic targets. Evaluating new targets using established cell lines is limited by the inexact correlation between responsiveness observed in cell lines versus that elicited in the patient. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from fresh tumor specimens recapitulate the diversity of breast cancer and reflect histopathology, tumor behavior, and the metastatic properties of the original tumor. The high degree of genomic preservation evident across primary tumors and their matching PDXs over serial passaging validate them as important preclinical tools. Indeed, there is accumulating evidence that PDXs can recapitulate treatment responses of the parental tumor. The finding that tumor engraftment is an independent and poor prognostic indicator of patient outcome represents the first step towards personalized medicine. Here we review the utility of breast cancer PDX models to study the clonal evolution of tumors and to evaluate novel therapies and drug resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 412 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 88 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 19%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 6%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 83 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 89 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 4%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 103 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,290,736
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#216
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,310
of 366,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#6
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.