↓ Skip to main content

Spatial features for Escherichia coli genome organization

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatial features for Escherichia coli genome organization
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1258-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Xie, Liang-Yu Fu, Qing-Yong Yang, Heng Xiong, Hongrui Xu, Bin-Guang Ma, Hong-Yu Zhang

Abstract

BackgroundIn bacterial genomes, the compactly encoded genes and operons are well organized, with genes in the same biological pathway or operons in the same regulon close to each other on the genome sequence. In addition, the linearly close genes have a higher probability of co-expression and their protein products tend to form protein¿protein interactions. However, the organization features of bacterial genomes in a three-dimensional space remain elusive. The DNA interaction data of Escherichia coli, measured by the genome conformation capture (GCC) technique, have recently become available, which allowed us to investigate the spatial features of bacterial genome organization.ResultsBy renormalizing the GCC data, we compared the interaction frequency of operon pairs in the same regulon with that of random operon pairs. The results showed that arrangements of operons in the E. coli genome tend to minimize the spatial distance between operons in the same regulon. A similar global organization feature exists for genes in biological pathways of E. coli. In addition, the genes close to each other spatially (even if they are far from each other on the genome sequence) tend to be co-expressed and form protein¿protein interactions. These results provided new insights into the organization principles of bacterial genomes and support the notion of transcription factory.ConclusionsThis study revealed the organization features of Escherichia coli genomic functional units in the 3D space and furthered our understanding of the link between the three-dimensional structure of chromosomes and biological function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 31%
Computer Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,800,681
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,135
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,600
of 352,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#143
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.