↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Functional and molecular characterisation of mammary side population cells

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Functional and molecular characterisation of mammary side population cells
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, December 2002
DOI 10.1186/bcr563
Authors

Azra J Alvi, Helen Clayton, Chirag Joshi, Tariq Enver, Alan Ashworth, Maria d M Vivanco, Trevor C Dale, Matthew J Smalley

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#643
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,487
of 135,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them