↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of ARMS and DNA sequencing for mutation analysis in clinical biopsy samples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of ARMS and DNA sequencing for mutation analysis in clinical biopsy samples
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1756-9966-29-132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian Ellison, Emma Donald, Gael McWalter, Lucy Knight, Lynn Fletcher, James Sherwood, Mireille Cantarini, Maria Orr, Georgina Speake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 3%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#206
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,210
of 108,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.