↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in Italy and Tunisia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in Italy and Tunisia
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-5-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Lucia Leporatti, Kamel Ghedira

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mauritius 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 144 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Chemistry 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#325
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,164
of 94,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.