Title |
Pre-amplification in the context of high-throughput qPCR gene expression experiment
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12867-015-0033-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vlasta Korenková, Justin Scott, Vendula Novosadová, Marie Jindřichová, Lucie Langerová, David Švec, Monika Šídová, Robert Sjöback |
Abstract |
With the introduction of the first high-throughput qPCR instrument on the market it became possible to perform thousands of reactions in a single run compared to the previous hundreds. In the high-throughput reaction, only limited volumes of highly concentrated cDNA or DNA samples can be added. This necessity can be solved by pre-amplification, which became a part of the high-throughput experimental workflow. Here, we focused our attention on the limits of the specific target pre-amplification reaction and propose the optimal, general setup for gene expression experiment using BioMark instrument (Fluidigm). For evaluating different pre-amplification factors following conditions were combined: four human blood samples from healthy donors and five transcripts having high to low expression levels; each cDNA sample was pre-amplified at four cycles (15, 18, 21, and 24) and five concentrations (equivalent to 0.078 ng, 0.32 ng, 1.25 ng, 5 ng, and 20 ng of total RNA). Factors identified as critical for a success of cDNA pre-amplification were cycle of pre-amplification, total RNA concentration, and type of gene. The selected pre-amplification reactions were further tested for optimal Cq distribution in a BioMark Array. The following concentrations combined with pre-amplification cycles were optimal for good quality samples: 20 ng of total RNA with 15 cycles of pre-amplification, 20x and 40x diluted; and 5 ng and 20 ng of total RNA with 18 cycles of pre-amplification, both 20x and 40x diluted. We set up upper limits for the bulk gene expression experiment using gene expression Dynamic Array and provided an easy-to-obtain tool for measuring of pre-amplification success. We also showed that variability of the pre-amplification, introduced into the experimental workflow of reverse transcription-qPCR, is lower than variability caused by the reverse transcription step. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
Researcher | 29 | 23% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 29% |
Engineering | 7 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |