You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The use of non-wood forest products by migrants in a new settlement: experiences of a Visayan community in Palawan, Philippines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-2-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Celeste Lacuna-Richman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,765,463
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#172
of 737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,289
of 67,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.