You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of novel immune checkpoints as targets for cancer immunotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2051-1426-1-s1-p135 |
| Authors |
Galit Rotman, Ofer Levy, Amir Toporik, Gady Cojocaru, Liat Dassa, Iris Hecht, Ilan Vaknin, Anat Oren, Zohar Tiran, Nora Tarcic, Sergey Nemzer, Tania Pergam, Amit Novik, Shirley Sameah-Greenwald, Joseph R Podojil, Stephen D Miller, Judith Leitner, Peter Steinberger, Eyal Neria, Zurit Levine |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,421
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,513
of 228,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.