↓ Skip to main content

A Taiwanese food frequency questionnaire correlates with plasma docosahexaenoic acid but not with plasma eicosapentaenoic acid levels: questionnaires and plasma biomarkers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Taiwanese food frequency questionnaire correlates with plasma docosahexaenoic acid but not with plasma eicosapentaenoic acid levels: questionnaires and plasma biomarkers
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kuo-Liong Chien, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Yi-Tsen Tsai, Pey-Rong Chen, Hung-Ju Lin, Hsiu-Ching Hsu, Yuan-The Lee, Ming-Fong Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 37%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#757
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,818
of 192,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.