↓ Skip to main content

3D coronary dark-blood interleaved with gray-blood (cDIG) MRI

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3D coronary dark-blood interleaved with gray-blood (cDIG) MRI
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-p217
Authors

Guoxi Xie, Bin Sun, Xiaoming Bi, Yutaka Natsuaki, Jing An, Qi Yang, Xin Liu, Hairong Zheng, Kuncheng Li, Debiao Li, Zhaoyang Fan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,595,692
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#715
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,197
of 320,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.