You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in snakes: Gene rearrangements and phylogenetic relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-569 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jie Yan, Hongdan Li, Kaiya Zhou |
| Abstract |
Snakes as a major reptile group display a variety of morphological characteristics pertaining to their diverse behaviours. Despite abundant analyses of morphological characters, molecular studies using mitochondrial and nuclear genes are limited. As a result, the phylogeny of snakes remains controversial. Previous studies on mitochondrial genomes of snakes have demonstrated duplication of the control region and translocation of trnL to be two notable features of the alethinophidian (all serpents except blindsnakes and threadsnakes) mtDNAs. Our purpose is to further investigate the gene organizations, evolution of the snake mitochondrial genome, and phylogenetic relationships among several major snake families. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,398,261
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,174
of 10,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,467
of 165,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#111
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.