↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in snakes: Gene rearrangements and phylogenetic relationships

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of the mitochondrial genome in snakes: Gene rearrangements and phylogenetic relationships
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-569
Pubmed ID
19038056
Authors

Jie Yan, Hongdan Li, Kaiya Zhou

Abstract

Snakes as a major reptile group display a variety of morphological characteristics pertaining to their diverse behaviours. Despite abundant analyses of morphological characters, molecular studies using mitochondrial and nuclear genes are limited. As a result, the phylogeny of snakes remains controversial. Previous studies on mitochondrial genomes of snakes have demonstrated duplication of the control region and translocation of trnL to be two notable features of the alethinophidian (all serpents except blindsnakes and threadsnakes) mtDNAs. Our purpose is to further investigate the gene organizations, evolution of the snake mitochondrial genome, and phylogenetic relationships among several major snake families.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
United States 2 2%
Sri Lanka 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 70 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,364,974
of 4,747,790 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,483
of 4,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,841
of 169,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#183
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,747,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.