You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasmid selection in Escherichia coli using an endogenous essential gene marker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-8-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shan Goh, Liam Good |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 18% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,026,258
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#90
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,857
of 101,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them