You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting population coverage of T-cell epitope-based diagnostics and vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-7-153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huynh-Hoa Bui, John Sidney, Kenny Dinh, Scott Southwood, Mark J Newman, Alessandro Sette |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 405 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 16% |
| Researcher | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 138 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 100 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 38 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 13% |
| Unknown | 145 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,549,093
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#713
of 7,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,738
of 84,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#4
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.