↓ Skip to main content

Platelet mitochondrial dysfunction in critically ill patients: comparison between sepsis and cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platelet mitochondrial dysfunction in critically ill patients: comparison between sepsis and cardiogenic shock
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0762-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Protti, Francesco Fortunato, Andrea Artoni, Anna Lecchi, Giovanna Motta, Giovanni Mistraletti, Cristina Novembrino, Giacomo Pietro Comi, Luciano Gattinoni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 30 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,405,755
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,485
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,698
of 395,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#295
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.