↓ Skip to main content

Normative values for the Foot Posture Index

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 785)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
654 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normative values for the Foot Posture Index
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2008
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-1-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony C Redmond, Yvonne Z Crane, Hylton B Menz

Abstract

The Foot Posture Index (FPI) is a validated method for quantifying standing foot posture, and is being used in a variety of clinical settings. There have however, been no normative data available to date for comparison and reference. This study aimed to establish normative FPI reference values.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 654 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 640 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 126 19%
Student > Bachelor 105 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 9%
Researcher 53 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 147 22%
Unknown 125 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 201 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 142 22%
Sports and Recreations 57 9%
Engineering 32 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 52 8%
Unknown 152 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#547,918
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#13
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,027
of 81,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them