↓ Skip to main content

Functional importance of different patterns of correlation between adjacent cassette exons in human and mouse

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
16 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional importance of different patterns of correlation between adjacent cassette exons in human and mouse
Published in
BMC Genomics, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-9-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Peng, Chenghai Xue, Jianning Bi, Tingting Li, Xiaowo Wang, Xuegong Zhang, Yanda Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 33%
Spain 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Computer Science 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,612
of 10,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,022
of 80,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.