You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A UMLS-based spell checker for natural language processing in vaccine safety
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2007
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-7-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Herman D Tolentino, Michael D Matters, Wikke Walop, Barbara Law, Wesley Tong, Fang Liu, Paul Fontelo, Katrin Kohl, Daniel C Payne |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 21% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 32 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
Engineering | 6 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,981,811
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#214
of 2,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,755
of 169,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them