↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of vildagliptin twice daily vs. sitagliptin once daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Crossover pilot study (J-VICTORIA study)

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of vildagliptin twice daily vs. sitagliptin once daily using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Crossover pilot study (J-VICTORIA study)
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2840-11-92
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaya Sakamoto, Rimei Nishimura, Taiga Irako, Daisuke Tsujino, Kiyotaka Ando, Kazunori Utsunomiya

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Russia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 14 16%
Other 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 19 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,522,787
of 9,451,379 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#155
of 630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,859
of 100,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,451,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.