↓ Skip to main content

New Players Tip the Scales in the Balance between Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Players Tip the Scales in the Balance between Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses
Published in
Molecular Pain, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-1-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua N Levinson, Alaa El-Husseini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 2 4%
Israel 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 47 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 53%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#190
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,002
of 74,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.