↓ Skip to main content

Iterative and prolonged remission in metastatic breast cancer using pegylated irinotecan: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iterative and prolonged remission in metastatic breast cancer using pegylated irinotecan: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-9-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mounia Amzerin, Maha Mokrim, Hassan Errihani, Martine J Piccart

Abstract

Pegylated irinotecan NKTR-102 is a topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate. This new formulation of irinotecan has been evaluated in a phase II clinical trial and is showing remarkable activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of an impressive iterative response to pegylated irinotecan NKTR-102 in metastatic breast cancer. We report the case of a 49-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with metastatic luminal A breast cancer with initial bone followed by liver and bone marrow metastases, treated with three lines of hormonal therapy, targeted therapy and six lines of chemotherapy. She showed no major response to conventional treatment, whereas, the tumor shrinkage under pegylated irinotecan NKTR-102 was impressive, durable and iterative. Reintroduction of an active drug is a valid approach as illustrated by our case. The results of the current phase III trials of pegylated irinotecan NKTR-102 are eagerly awaited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Other 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,801,174
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,357
of 3,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,096
of 357,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.