You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Site-specific analysis of gene expression in early osteoarthritis using the Pond-Nuki model in dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-1-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron M Stoker, James L Cook, Keiichi Kuroki, Derek B Fox |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#171
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,146
of 66,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.