↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of multivalent, modified- live virus (MLV) vaccines administered to early weaned beef calves subsequently challenged with virulent Bovine viral diarrhea virus type 2

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of multivalent, modified- live virus (MLV) vaccines administered to early weaned beef calves subsequently challenged with virulent Bovine viral diarrhea virus type 2
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0342-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel F Chamorro, Paul H Walz, Thomas Passler, Edzard van Santen, Julie Gard, Soren P Rodning, Kay P Riddell, Patricia K Galik, Yijing Zhang

Abstract

Vaccination of young calves against Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is desirable in dairy and beef operations to reduce clinical disease and prevent spread of the virus among cattle. Although protection from clinical disease by multivalent, modified-live virus (MLV) vaccines has been demonstrated, the ability of MLV vaccines to prevent viremia and viral shedding in young calves possessing passive immunity is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of three different MLV vaccines to prevent clinical disease, viremia, and virus shedding in early weaned beef calves possessing maternal immunity that were vaccinated once at 45 days prior to challenge with virulent BVDV 2.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,545,100
of 5,011,922 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#553
of 878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,127
of 180,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#36
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,011,922 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 878 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.