You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expression of FOXA1 and GATA-3 in breast cancer: the prognostic significance in hormone receptor-negative tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bcr2327 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Albergaria, Joana Paredes, Bárbara Sousa, Fernanda Milanezi, Vítor Carneiro, Joana Bastos, Sandra Costa, Daniella Vieira, Nair Lopes, Eric W Lam, Nuno Lunet, Fernando Schmitt |
| Abstract |
The expression of additional genes, other than oestrogen receptor (ER), may be important to the hormone-responsive phenotype of breast cancer. Microarray analyses have revealed that forkhead box A1 (FOXA1) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3) are expressed in close association with ERalpha, both encoding for transcription factors with a potential involvement in the ERalpha-mediated action in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore if the expression of FOXA1 and GATA-3 may provide an opportunity to stratify subsets of patients that could have better outcome, among the ERalpha-negative/poor prognosis breast cancer group. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,262,023
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#347
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,336
of 123,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.