You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo observation of gold nanoparticles in the central nervous system of Blaberus discoidalis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-9-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aracely Rocha, Yan Zhou, Subrata Kundu, Jorge M González, S BradleighVinson, Hong Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 37% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 29% |
| Engineering | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#296
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,008
of 107,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.