↓ Skip to main content

A Practical Guide to Rodent Islet Isolation and Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
416 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Practical Guide to Rodent Islet Isolation and Assessment
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12575-009-9021-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey D Carter, Stacey B Dula, Kathryn L Corbin, Runpei Wu, Craig S Nunemaker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 400 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 26%
Researcher 85 20%
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 48 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 14%
Engineering 18 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 4%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 57 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#62
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,831
of 166,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them