You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomimetic poly(amidoamine) hydrogels as synthetic materials for cell culture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-6-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuela Jacchetti, Elisa Emilitri, Simona Rodighiero, Marco Indrieri, Antonella Gianfelice, Cristina Lenardi, Alessandro Podestà, Elisabetta Ranucci, Paolo Ferruti, Paolo Milani |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 35% |
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 6 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2010.
All research outputs
#4,760,740
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#159
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,954
of 167,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them