↓ Skip to main content

Combining metal oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC) and selective mass spectrometry for robust identification of in vivo protein phosphorylation sites

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining metal oxide affinity chromatography (MOAC) and selective mass spectrometry for robust identification of in vivo protein phosphorylation sites
Published in
Plant Methods, November 2005
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Wolschin, Wolfram Weckwerth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Chemistry 6 9%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#510
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,087
of 61,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them