You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SMART amplification combined with cDNA size fractionation in order to obtain large full-length clones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-5-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Wellenreuther, Ingo Schupp, The German cDNA Consortium, Annemarie Poustka, Stefan Wiemann |
| Abstract |
cDNA libraries are widely used to identify genes and splice variants, and as a physical resource for full-length clones. Conventionally-generated cDNA libraries contain a high percentage of 5'-truncated clones. Current library construction methods that enrich for full-length mRNA are laborious, and involve several enzymatic steps performed on mRNA, which renders them sensitive to RNA degradation. The SMART technique for full-length enrichment is robust but results in limited cDNA insert size of the library. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,234
of 11,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,067
of 59,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them