↓ Skip to main content

System-level network analysis of nitrogen starvation and recovery in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii reveals potential new targets for increased lipid accumulation

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
System-level network analysis of nitrogen starvation and recovery in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii reveals potential new targets for increased lipid accumulation
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13068-014-0171-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Valledor, Takeshi Furuhashi, Luis Recuenco-Muñoz, Stefanie Wienkoop, Wolfram Weckwerth

Abstract

Nitrogen starvation is known to cause drastic alterations in physiology and metabolism leading to the accumulation of lipid bodies in many microalgae, and it thus presents an important alternative for biofuel production. However, despite the importance of this process, the molecular mechanisms that mediate the metabolic remodeling induced by N starvation and especially by stress recovery are still poorly understood, and new candidates for bioengineering are needed to make this process useful for biofuel production.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 26%
Engineering 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#1,416
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,068
of 359,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.