↓ Skip to main content

Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
396 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
891 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-3-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Haring, Sascha Offermann, Tanja Danker, Ina Horst, Christoph Peterhansel, Maike Stam

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 891 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 17 2%
Unknown 839 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 281 32%
Researcher 200 22%
Student > Master 124 14%
Student > Bachelor 64 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 120 13%
Unknown 58 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 538 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 191 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 3%
Chemistry 12 1%
Neuroscience 11 1%
Other 38 4%
Unknown 77 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,283,918
of 19,342,442 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#410
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,809
of 292,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,342,442 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them