You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of old and new ventricular fibrillation detection algorithms for automated external defibrillators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-4-60 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anton Amann, Robert Tratnig, Karl Unterkofler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 24% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 38 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#212
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,030
of 60,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them