↓ Skip to main content

MRI-based visual and haptic catheter feedback: simulating a novel system's contribution to efficient and safe MRI-guided cardiac electrophysiology procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MRI-based visual and haptic catheter feedback: simulating a novel system's contribution to efficient and safe MRI-guided cardiac electrophysiology procedures
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-16-s1-o50
Authors

Ka-Wai Kwok, Yue Chen, Thomas CP Chau, Wayne Luk, Kent Ronald Nilsson, Ehud J Schmidt, Zion T Tse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 38%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 69%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,488,843
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#388
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,073
of 320,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.