↓ Skip to main content

A new way to rapidly create functional, fluorescent fusion proteins: random insertion of GFP with an in vitrotransposition reaction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new way to rapidly create functional, fluorescent fusion proteins: random insertion of GFP with an in vitrotransposition reaction
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, June 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas L Sheridan, Catherine H Berlot, Antoine Robert, Fiona M Inglis, Klara B Jakobsdottir, James R Howe, Thomas E Hughes

Abstract

The jellyfish green fluorescent protein (GFP) can be inserted into the middle of another protein to produce a functional, fluorescent fusion protein. Finding permissive sites for insertion, however, can be difficult. Here we describe a transposon-based approach for rapidly creating libraries of GFP fusion proteins. We tested our approach on the glutamate receptor subunit, GluR1, and the G protein subunit, alphas. All of the in-frame GFP insertions produced a fluorescent protein, consistent with the idea that GFP will fold and form a fluorophore when inserted into virtually any domain of another protein. Some of the proteins retained their signaling function, and the random nature of the transposition process revealed permissive sites for insertion that would not have been predicted on the basis of structural or functional models of how that protein works. This technique should greatly speed the discovery of functional fusion proteins, genetically encodable sensors, and optimized fluorescence resonance energy transfer pairs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 17%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,227,468
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#169
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,900
of 48,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them