↓ Skip to main content

Rheumatoid arthritis and smoking: putting the pieces together

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rheumatoid arthritis and smoking: putting the pieces together
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/ar2751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsuzsanna Baka, Edit Buzás, György Nagy

Abstract

Besides atherosclerosis and lung cancer, smoking is considered to play a major role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. It has long been known that there is a connection between rheumatoid factor-positive rheumatoid arthritis and cigarette smoking. Recently, an important gene-environment interaction has been revealed; that is, carrying specific HLA-DRB1 alleles encoding the shared epitope and smoking establish a significant risk for anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis. We summarize how smoking-related alteration of the cytokine balance, the increased risk of infections (the possibility of cross-reactivity) and modifications of autoantigens by citrullination may contribute to the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 4 2%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 159 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,342,726
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#715
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,528
of 122,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.