↓ Skip to main content

ANDES: Statistical tools for the ANalyses of DEep Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ANDES: Statistical tools for the ANalyses of DEep Sequencing
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-3-199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelvin Li, Eli Venter, Shibu Yooseph, Timothy B Stockwell, Lance D Eckerle, Mark R Denison, David J Spiro, Barbara A Methé

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 47 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 4 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,249
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,174
of 95,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.