↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of interaction specificity of fungus-growing termites and Termitomyces symbionts in South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of interaction specificity of fungus-growing termites and Termitomyces symbionts in South Africa
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duur K Aanen, Vera ID Ros, Henrik H de Fine Licht, Jannette Mitchell, Z Wilhelm de Beer, Bernard Slippers, Corinne Rouland-LeFèvre, Jacobus J Boomsma

Abstract

Termites of the subfamily Macrotermitinae live in a mutualistic symbiosis with basidiomycete fungi of the genus Termitomyces. Here, we explored interaction specificity in fungus-growing termites using samples from 101 colonies in South-Africa and Senegal, belonging to eight species divided over three genera. Knowledge of interaction specificity is important to test the hypothesis that inhabitants (symbionts) are taxonomically less diverse than 'exhabitants' (hosts) and to test the hypothesis that transmission mode is an important determinant for interaction specificity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 131 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Professor 7 5%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 64%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,076
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,205
of 82,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.