You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a loop-mediated Isothermal amplification assay for sensitive and rapid detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Microbiology, September 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-8-163 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wataru Yamazaki, Masanori Ishibashi, Ryuji Kawahara, Kiyoshi Inoue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Madagascar | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
Researcher | 19 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#348
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,168
of 101,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.