↓ Skip to main content

Complete DNA sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complete DNA sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, August 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-7-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena T Funk, Sabine Berg, Karin Krupinska, Uwe G Maier, Kirsten Krause

Abstract

The holoparasitic plant genus Cuscuta comprises species with photosynthetic capacity and functional chloroplasts as well as achlorophyllous and intermediate forms with restricted photosynthetic activity and degenerated chloroplasts. Previous data indicated significant differences with respect to the plastid genome coding capacity in different Cuscuta species that could correlate with their photosynthetic activity. In order to shed light on the molecular changes accompanying the parasitic lifestyle, we sequenced the plastid chromosomes of the two species Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii. Both species are capable of performing photosynthesis, albeit with varying efficiencies. Together with the plastid genome of Epifagus virginiana, an achlorophyllous parasitic plant whose plastid genome has been sequenced, these species represent a series of progression towards total dependency on the host plant, ranging from reduced levels of photosynthesis in C. reflexa to a restricted photosynthetic activity and degenerated chloroplasts in C. gronovii to an achlorophyllous state in E. virginiana.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
Canada 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 24%
Chemistry 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 20 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#635
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,549
of 67,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them