↓ Skip to main content

The role of evidence and context for implementing a multimodal intervention to increase HIV testing

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of evidence and context for implementing a multimodal intervention to increase HIV testing
Published in
Implementation Science, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0214-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara G Bokhour, Hemen Saifu, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, Gemmae M Fix, Jane Burgess, Michael D Fletcher, Herschel Knapp, Steven M Asch

Abstract

Increasing the use of routine preventive care such as HIV testing is important, yet implementation of such evidence-based clinical care is complex. The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) model for implementation posits that implementation will be most successful when the evidence, context, and facilitation strategies are strong for the clinical practice. We evaluated the relative importance of perceived evidence, context, and facilitation of HIV testing during the implementation of a multimodal intervention in US Department of Veterans Affairs primary care clinics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Psychology 11 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,032,575
of 25,014,758 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#766
of 1,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,087
of 370,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,014,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.