You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metoclopramide or domperidone improves post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0784-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bei Hu, Heng Ye, Cheng Sun, Yichen Zhang, Zhigang Lao, Fanghong Wu, Zhaohui Liu, Linxi Huang, Changchun Qu, Lewu Xian, Hao Wu, Yingjie Jiao, Junling Liu, Juyu Cai, Weiying Chen, Zhiqiang Nie, Zaiyi Liu, Chunbo Chen |
| Abstract |
The use of prokinetic agents on post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes is controversial. The aim of the present study was to examine if metoclopramide or domperidone can increase the success rate of post-pyloric placement of spiral nasojejunal tubes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| El Salvador | 2 | 14% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#4,487,614
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,974
of 6,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,331
of 387,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#362
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.