You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new typical finding in late gadolinium enhanced images for the diagnosis of endomyocardial fibrosis - the double V sign
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-13-s1-o40 |
| Authors |
Adriano C Carneiro, Roberta I Mochiduky, Leonardo F Zancaner, Estevan V Cabeda, Valeria M Moreira, Mario S Ribeiro, Alexandre V Villa, Roberto Kalil, Filho, Vera M Salemi, Charles Mady, Carlos E Rochitte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 44% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 78% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,984,593
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#152
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,527
of 194,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.