↓ Skip to main content

Towards systems genetic analyses in barley: Integration of phenotypic, expression and genotype data into GeneNetwork

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards systems genetic analyses in barley: Integration of phenotypic, expression and genotype data into GeneNetwork
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, November 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-9-73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnis Druka, Ilze Druka, Arthur G Centeno, Hongqiang Li, Zhaohui Sun, William TB Thomas, Nicola Bonar, Brian J Steffenson, Steven E Ullrich, Andris Kleinhofs, Roger P Wise, Timothy J Close, Elena Potokina, Zewei Luo, Carola Wagner, Günther F Schweizer, David F Marshall, Michael J Kearsey, Robert W Williams, Robbie Waugh

Abstract

A typical genetical genomics experiment results in four separate data sets; genotype, gene expression, higher-order phenotypic data and metadata that describe the protocols, processing and the array platform. Used in concert, these data sets provide the opportunity to perform genetic analysis at a systems level. Their predictive power is largely determined by the gene expression dataset where tens of millions of data points can be generated using currently available mRNA profiling technologies. Such large, multidimensional data sets often have value beyond that extracted during their initial analysis and interpretation, particularly if conducted on widely distributed reference genetic materials. Besides quality and scale, access to the data is of primary importance as accessibility potentially allows the extraction of considerable added value from the same primary dataset by the wider research community. Although the number of genetical genomics experiments in different plant species is rapidly increasing, none to date has been presented in a form that allows quick and efficient on-line testing for possible associations between genes, loci and traits of interest by an entire research community.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Italy 2 3%
Sweden 2 3%
Czechia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 54 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 48%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 83%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 2 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#316
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,158
of 180,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.