↓ Skip to main content

Health workforce responses to global health initiatives funding: a comparison of Malawi and Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health workforce responses to global health initiatives funding: a comparison of Malawi and Zambia
Published in
Human Resources for Health, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-8-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruairí Brugha, John Kadzandira, Joseph Simbaya, Patrick Dicker, Victor Mwapasa, Aisling Walsh

Abstract

Shortages of health workers are obstacles to utilising global health initiative (GHI) funds effectively in Africa. This paper reports and analyses two countries' health workforce responses during a period of large increases in GHI funds.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 26%
Researcher 21 15%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 37 27%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 34%
Social Sciences 30 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,485,360
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#277
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,274
of 104,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them